#185. A spotty flaw in the Zeiss FE 35/2.8 ZA & Sony A7r combo ?

[Note : This post is part of the ongoing review of the Sony A7r system]

Shooting at low apertures against the produces sun stars that can add a lot to some pictures. The more open the diaphragm, the more blurry (scattered around the frame) the sun’s diffraction patter. Conversely, the less open the diaphragm, the better individual rays appear. 2 for every blade in the diaphragm.

But there seems to be a limit with the Sony A7r & Sony Zeiss FE Sonnar 2,8/35 ZA, as illustrated in the photograph below 😦

Spotted reflections ?

Spotted reflections ?

The sun rays are there all right, prolonged by a play of light and shadows in mist produced by the sun’s heat on the morning frost. But so is an unwanted battalion of “spots” surrounding the sun in a geometrical pattern, shown here in high contrast.

I can only imagine the increased depth of field at f/20 has picked up reflections of the sun on the sensor ???

Whatever the reason, this is going to be a post-processing nightmare, if I can get rid of them at all …

It wouldn’t be so bad if these spots only appeared at f/20, but they are plainly visible, although in a more diffused manner at much more mundane apertures, such as f/11. See below, original jpeg :

Sun spots of a new kind ...

Sun spots of a new kind …

This one could be saved with a panoramic crop, but still, there’s a major (coating ?) problem that will pester all those fans of sun stars (probably astronomy fas as well) …

Note that these two pictures also display what Leica Boss called the bullseye colour shift (explanations on how to cure that are in the article).
Any clues ? Sony, perhaps ?

Crop da spots

Crop da spots

8 thoughts on “#185. A spotty flaw in the Zeiss FE 35/2.8 ZA & Sony A7r combo ?

  1. Pingback: #183. Sony A7r, first impressions : The Magnificent Seven | Dear Susan,

  2. Pingback: A7r in Stock at BHphoto. And the big Sony A7 and A7r reviews roundup (They are cameras of the year at ePhotozine and Imaging Resource). | sonyalpharumors

  3. I wonder if this is the result of a rear element that is much closer to the sensor then you would normally find in a DSLR? The light reflecting off the sensor (no antialiasing filter may make this worse??) and hitting the rear element and reflecting back. This happens in all cameras, but the short distance of the Sonnar lens and maybe a more reflective sensor might amplify it. This is just speculation. I have yet to see this, but I have not shot this kind of shot yet. Interesting post.

  4. It doesn’t really matter what the problem is. Just work around it. Every camera has flaws. Perfection is reserved for the gods.

  5. Pingback: #183. Sony A7r, first impressions : The Magnificent Seven | DearSusan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s